Aristotles Politics Essays - Forms Of Government,

Aristotle's Politics Aristotle does not regard politics as a separate science from ethics, but as the completion, and almost a verification of it. The moral ideal in political administration is only a different aspect of that which also applies to individual happiness. Humans are by nature social beings, and the possession of rational speech (logos) in itself leads us to social union. The state is a development from the family through the village community, an offshoot of the family. Formed originally for the satisfaction of natural wants, it exists afterwards for moral ends and for the promotion of the higher life. The state in fact is no mere local union for the prevention of wrong doing, and the convenience of exchange. It is also no mere institution for the protection of goods and property. It is a genuine moral organization for advancing the development of humans. The family, which is chronologically prior to the state, involves a series of relations between husband and wife, parent and child, master and slave. Aristotle regards the slave as a piece of live property having no existence except in relation to his master. Slavery is a natural institution because there is a ruling and a subject class among people related to each other as soul to body; however, we must distinguish between those who are slaves by nature, and those who have become slaves merely by war and conquest. Household management involves the acquisition of riches, but must be distinguished from money-making for its own sake. Wealth is everything whose value can be measured by money; but it is the use rather than the possession of commodities which constitutes riches. Financial exchange first involved bartering. However, with the difficulties of transmission between countries widely separated from each other, money as a currency arose. At first it was merely a specific amount of weighted or measured metal. Afterwards it received a stamp to mark the amount. Demand is the real standard of value. Currency, therefore, is merely a convention which represents the demand; it stands between the producer and the recipient and secures fairness. Usury is an unnatural and reprehensible use of money. The communal ownership of wives and property as sketched by Plato in the Republic rests on a false conception of political society. For, the state is not a homogeneous unity, as Plato believed, but rather is made up of dissimilar elements. The classification of constitutions is based on the fact that government may be exercised either for the good of the governed or of the governing, and may be either concentrated in one person or shared by a few or by the many. There are thus three true forms of government: monarchy, aristocracy, and constitutional republic. The perverted forms of these are tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. The difference between the last two is not that democracy is a government of the many, and oligarchy of the few; instead, democracy is the state of the poor, and oligarchy of the rich. Considered in the abstract, these six states stand in the following order of preference: monarchy, aristocracy, constitutional republic, democracy, oligarchy, tyranny. But though w ith a perfect person monarchy would be the highest form of government, the absence of such people puts it practically out of consideration. Similarly, true aristocracy is hardly ever found in its uncorrupted form. It is in the constitution that the good person and the good citizen coincide. Ideal preferences aside, then, the constitutional republic is regarded as the best attainable form of government, especially as it secures that predominance of a large middle class, which is the chief basis of permanence in any state. With the spread of population, democracy is likely to become the general form of government. Which is the best state is a question that cannot be directly answered. Different races are suited for different forms of government, and the question which meets the politician is not so much what is abstractly the best state, but what is the best state under existing circumstances. Generally, however, the best state will enable anyone to act in the best and live in the happiest manner. To serve this end the ideal state should be neither too great nor too

Religion and the Environment Essays

Religion and the Environment Essays Religion and the Environment Essay Religion and the Environment Essay There are many speculations as too why our culture, the â€Å"West† seems to not care about the environment or the ways of nature. Many people believe it is the way that the bible views nature, specifically within the Christianity religion. Reasons for this is that Christians don’t view nature as a divine power like other religions, like Hinduism or Buddhism; Christianity is also a strong anthropocentric religion, teaching that human beings are divinely ordained to rule over and dominate all other species and nature (Kinsley 103). Does this mean that all Christians view nature as pure nothingness and an inconvenience? No, this religion is more focused on the spiritual fulfillment with the presence of God, and not specifically to the mysterious powers of the earth (Kinsley 106). â€Å"Many Christian writings, and much Christian theology, relegate nature and matter generally to a low status relative to the divine which is equated with spirit alone (Kinsley 103).† This is a very key point brought up by Kinsley because he shows that the religion doesn’t view nature as a holy or scared place, but a view of the world that postulates a transcendent deity who creates the world but does not invest himself in it in such a way to make it holy or sacred (Kinsley 104). So hypothetically let’s say when the people of the religion would clear out some land for their civilization, they never viewed it as a destruction of a spiritual being. Christianity is very anthropocentric, which sets human beings against nature, makes human beings superior to, and in control of, nature (Kinsley 104). Here is an entry from the Bible that has a good demonstration of this. â€Å"Thou hast given him dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet; all sheep and oxen, and also the beasts of the field, the birds of the air, and the fish in the sea, whatever passes along the paths of the sea (Psalms 8:5-8).† The Christians again are viewi